Michael Fullan believes that "to take us to higher levels...we would expect the best learning organizations to investigate, learn, experiment, and develop better solutions. This takes time...with the right kind of intelligent accountability, we would know whether organizations were engaged in quality problem-solving processes even if their short-term outcomes where not showing increases" (Leadership and Sustainability, p. 27).
If you have noticed the irony that this concept raises in relationship to the adequate yearly progress required by the federal government, you are certainly on the road to systems thinking. School systems are on the right track if they manage energy rather than time. For example, instead of providing the current "flavor of the week" at inservices, systems thinkers use input from the leadership team and each individual to collectively plan the year's staff development. They require teachers to implement the strategy in their classrooms, to share results with colleagues, and to archive findings in their system staff development notebook. They also require educators to link their professional growth plans to district and building level initiatives, which are in turn determined by student achievement data. To the left is an example of an end-of-the-year data collection sheet that asks each individual for input on the system's staff development for the following year.
|